Essay check list (prerequisite for essay assessment) - pomůcka k psaní eseje na univerzitě v Oulu ve Finsku

R. Čimingová

- k článku „Studium v Oulu – inspirace pro budoucí učitele“ od R. Čimingové, KL 35


The chosen topic/question is relevant regarding the content of the course, and is explicitly presented as such.


The essay meets the requirements regarding layout.


The APA citation style has been used consistently.




0

1 - 2

3 - 4

5

Multiple perspectives

Myessay does not provide any perspectives on the topic. It is a random collection of issues somehow related to the title. The use of literature is non-existent. I have mostly focused on the presentation of a single perspective, showing only a slight attempt to bring other perspectives into discussion. My choice of literature does not show much evidence of this attempt. I have introduced several different perspectives from which I have examined the topic/question of my own. My choices regarding literature mostly support this attempt. I have introduced several different perspectives from which I have profoundly examined the topic/question of my essay. This can also be seen in my choices regarding literature.

Discussion

There is no evidence of discussion in my essay. Ideas are presented as unconnected items which do not build argumentation. My essay shows very little evidence of discussing and drawing connections between different ideas/ viewpoints/ theories. I have resorted to summarizing and stating facts instead of building argumentation. I have successfully carried out a discussion between ideas/ viewpoints/ theories presented in relevant literature and those of my own. I have made some connections between the different ideas and viewpoints. I have built my argumentation quite thoroughly, and have presented relevant and critical questions and conclusions. I have successfully carried out an extensive discussion between ideas/ viewpoints/ theories presented in relevant literature and those of my own. I have explicitly made connections between the different ideas and viewpoints. My argumentation is thorough and logical, which can be seen in the way I have presented relevant and critical questions and conclusions.

Coherence

My essay completely lacks coherence and does not present any attempt to help the reader follow my train of thought. My train of thought is hard to follow, as the content ((what is being said) and structure (how the ideas are presented) do not form a coherent entity. My train of thought is hard to follow. My essay is, for the most part, a coherent piece of work from beginning to end; both the content (what is being said) and structure (how the ideas are presented) help the reader follow my train of thought, eg. from introduction to conclusion, argument to explanation, hypothesis to evidence etc. There are some individual strands that seem out of place or irrelevant either regarding content or structure. There is a definite coherence in my essay from beginning to end; both the content (what is being said) and structure (how the ideas are presented) help the reader follow my train of thought, eg. from introduction to conclusion, argument to explanation, hypothesis to evidence etc.

R. Čimingová

Navigátor
Chci se podívat na:
Chci vyhledat:
Právě se nacházíte na:
homepage KM
Kritické listy

[ukázat mapu celého webu]
Kritické listy
Čteme s porozuměním


E-infosíť
Přihlášení do e-mailové infosítě Vám zaručí zasílání novinek a aktualit přímo na Váš e-mail. (více informací)
jméno:
e-mail:
cislo:
zde napište: 531
 
Je již přihlášeno 2334 lidí.
Projekt ESF
Investice do rozvoje vzdělávání

Ostatní

Licence Creative Commons
Kritické myšlení, jejímž autorem je Kritické myšlení, o.s., podléhá licenci Creative Commons Uveďte autora-Neužívejte dílo komerčně-Nezasahujte do díla 3.0 Česko .
Vytvořeno na základě tohoto díla: www.kritickemysleni.cz